Every mark in GCSE English is a writing mark

When a family asks us for help with GCSE English, they usually picture a tutor who explains. The tutor sits with the student, talks through the poem or the play, and answers every question until it all makes sense. Students often expect the same thing, because understanding feels like the whole job.

Suppose a tutor explained Macbeth to your child perfectly. What would your child still have to do in the exam hall to turn that understanding into marks?

They would have to write it down. Your child is never marked on what they understood, only on what they wrote. So writing is the habit a student should be building from Year 7, long before the exam is close.

In our experience, students make the most progress when they practise their writing in a focused way, with a tutor supporting them as they go. That is why our whole programme is built around the writing. Students are taught through their own writing and through practice questions. In two sessions each week we explain the subject and show the skills the examiner rewards, and in the third the students write, with a tutor there to guide them. Writing is what solves almost every problem a student has, and we have written about why in Why almost every problem comes back to writing.

Half the marks are your child’s own writing

Take AQA GCSE English Language as the example, because every figure below is AQA’s own. There are two exam papers, each worth 80 marks, and each one is split down the middle.^[1]

Section A, worth 40 marks, asks questions about a text your child has not seen before. Section B, also worth 40 marks, asks for one long piece of your child’s own writing.

So writing your own piece is 80 of the 160 marks across the whole qualification. Half the English Language GCSE is your child’s own writing. Section B of Paper 1 on its own, a single question asking for a single piece of creative writing, is a quarter of the entire GCSE.^[1]

Most families do not know this. Creative writing tends to be treated as the easy part at the end of the paper, yet it is the single biggest block of marks in the subject.

The half-and-half split belongs to every board, not only AQA. The rules for every English Language GCSE in England say that writing is 50% of the marks.^[4] So the same is true on Edexcel, Eduqas and OCR. On Edexcel and Eduqas, both papers have a Section B for writing worth 40 marks, and so does OCR’s Paper 1.^[6]

The international GCSEs are also split evenly. On Edexcel International GCSE English Language A, Paper 1 has 45 marks of reading and a 45-mark writing task. Paper 2 has 30 marks of reading and a 30-mark writing task.^[7] On the June 2024 Cambridge IGCSE First Language English papers, 80 of the 160 marks were for the quality of the student’s writing.^[8] We have not checked CCEA.

Even the reading half is written

You might reasonably think Section A is safer, since it is about a text and gives your child something to hold on to. But how is Section A actually answered? Your child does not tick a box or choose between four options. They answer in written paragraphs.

A question might ask how the writer uses language to present a character, and your child may understand it perfectly. To get the marks, though, they must build that understanding into sentences: an argument about what the writer is doing, the right quotation, and an explanation of the effect it has on the reader. If the understanding is there but the paragraph is muddled, the marks do not come.

So the paper does not divide into a reading half and a writing half. Section A is writing about someone else’s text, and Section B is writing your own. Both halves are writing.

English Literature works the same way, only more so, because both papers are essays from start to finish. To reach the top band in AQA’s GCSE English Literature, the exam board wants “a critical, exploratory, well-structured argument”.^[2] On AQA’s modern texts, up to 4 marks are given purely for technical accuracy, with the board asking students to “spell and punctuate with consistent accuracy” and to use vocabulary and sentence structures “to achieve effective control of meaning”.^[2] Every English Literature GCSE in England must give 5% of its marks to vocabulary, sentence structures, spelling and punctuation.^[5] A child can know every scene of the play and still lose those marks.

Almost every mark on one question, half on another

At this point the argument stops being opinion. Every year AQA publish a “Report on the exam” for each paper, and sometimes they quote the average mark students achieved on a question. We went through eight of these reports, from 2018 to 2023, and pulled out every figure they stated.^[3]

Two numbers stand out when you put them side by side.

The short retrieval question (4 marks, “list four things”). In June 2018 the average was “nearly 3.9”, with “almost 90% of students scoring the full 4 marks”. In June 2019 it was “over 3.9”.^[3] That is around 97–98% of the marks available, so almost every mark on that question is won.

The 40-mark writing question. In June 2022 the average was 11.4 out of 24 for content and organisation, and 8.0 out of 16 for technical accuracy. In June 2023 the figures were 11.5 and 8.^[3] That is about 49% of the marks available.

It would be easy to draw the wrong conclusion from that table. This does not mean students are worse at writing than at reading. As a percentage, Section B actually holds up slightly better than the analysis questions in Section A, which typically run at around 44–45%. AQA said so directly in one report: the cohort “were performing less well in response to the Reading section, and performed relatively better in the Writing section.”^[3]

So why does the writing question matter so much? The answer is its size. Losing half of a 4-mark question costs 2 marks, while losing half of a 40-mark question costs about 20. No single question in the paper loses your child more marks than the writing question: the largest question in Section A is 16 marks, and students typically lose around 9 there.^[3]

The trouble lies in the size of the question rather than in the ability of the students. On a question that large, half the marks are routinely lost.

More writing is not the same as better writing

The obvious advice is to write more, since writing is half the marks. So a student writes another story, and then another, and each time they get a grade and perhaps a comment such as “good effort, add more detail”. Very often, in our experience, nothing changes.

Why not? A 40-mark writing question asks for many skills at once, stacked together. In AQA’s scheme, the 40 marks split into 24 for content and organisation and 16 for technical accuracy,^[2] and inside those two totals sit six separate things. The student has to choose ideas that suit the audience and purpose, and structure the piece so it builds rather than wanders. They have to choose vocabulary deliberately rather than just reaching for longer words, vary their sentence forms for effect, use punctuation accurately and to create rhythm, and spell correctly.

Write a whole story and you practise all six at once, badly, and you get back one grade covering all of them. That grade tells you where you are, but it cannot tell you which of the six things to fix.

We think this is why a student can write ten stories and stay on the same grade: they repeat the same weakness ten times, because nothing ever isolated it.

The published marks show the same pattern elsewhere in the paper. On one paper in June 2023, AQA noted that “just 3% of students were awarded marks in the highest level” on an 8-mark analysis question.^[3] We think the reason is less a lack of effort than the fact that the specific skill this question needed had never been separated out and practised on its own.

One element at a time

The fix is narrower, and much less satisfying, than writing another story.

Take one element. Work on it until it is right. Then take the next.

A single paragraph, rewritten four times with a specific correction each time, will move a grade further than four new essays. In our experience most students find that harder than writing the four essays, because every weakness in that one paragraph stays in full view.

That means the feedback has to be specific enough to act on. A comment like “add more detail” gives a student nothing to do, whereas a comment like this one does:

This sentence tells me the room was frightening. Show me one detail that makes me feel it, and cut the word “frightening”; you should not need it.

A student can act on that comment today, and can check afterwards whether they managed it.

Three things to do this week

Understanding gets your child into the exam hall, but only writing earns the marks. If your child is aiming at a 7, 8 or 9, start with these three changes.

1. Stop treating creative writing as the easy part. On AQA, it is a quarter of the GCSE on Paper 1 alone, so give it the time that a quarter of the marks deserves.

2. Stop marking whole essays. Pick one element, such as openings, sentence variety or punctuation for effect, and work only on that until it is genuinely fixed.

3. Ask for corrections you can act on. If a piece of feedback does not tell your child what to do differently in the next sentence they write, it will not change a grade.

We built Sophicly to work in exactly this way: every piece marked against the examiner’s criteria, element by element, with the correction attached.

If you would like to see where your child stands right now, our free assessment takes five minutes and gives you a predicted grade plus the specific skills holding them back.

Sources